Category: Uncategorized

  • Money Tree

    The Lawfirmspotlight money tree

    Every money page and hub on lawfirmspotlight.com, and the posts that feed each one

    Drawn from the live internal links across 2 published posts and 12 pages, crawled 16 August 2026. Nothing is hand-placed: a branch is thick because posts link to it, and bare because none do.

    Read it bottom-up.Roots — off-site proofTrunk — the domainHow we do it — the method hubsBare or broken — needs a leafBranch thickness = posts feeding it

    Swipe the diagram sideways, or read the same tree as text below it.

    The Lawfirmspotlight money treeA tree diagram of lawfirmspotlight.com. The trunk is the domain, each branch is a money page or definitive hub, and each leaf is a blog post that links up to it. The full structure is repeated as a text outline directly below this diagram.ON YOUR SITE — what you controlOFF YOUR SITE — what the market says (the roots)bare — no posts link herePAGEXmlrpc.PhpBare0 posts feed thislawfirmspotlight.com2 posts · 12 pages

    The same tree in text — every node is a live link

    How we do it — the method hubs

    The definitive articles. Each one owns a concept, and every post that demonstrates that concept links up to it.

    Xmlrpc.PhpBare

    page · 0 posts link here

    No posts link here yet.

    Method: every published post and page was fetched through the WordPress REST API and its outbound internal links extracted from the rendered body. A leaf counts once per post, only when that post links to the branch URL. Redirects were followed and reported rather than silently merged. Crawled 16 August 2026.

    Findings — each defect names a department

    Defect Where Routes to
    Bare branch Xmlrpc.Php Content — one customer story per bare offer
    Shallow roots lawfirmspotlight.com Entity / authority — Knowledge Panel and sameAs

    Action list — 16 August 2026

    Run this on your own site

    Two doors, one diagnosis

    This tree is a scan, and a scan is only worth running if it tells you which department to walk to. Both doors below start from the same diagnosis. Take the skill file and run it yourself, or have us run it and hand you the findings — either way the routing table underneath says where each finding goes.

    1 · Do it yourself

    Take the skill file and run it

    A complete, runnable skill file — the five layers, the seven-step method, the six defects, and the nine-check QA gate. Hand it to Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini or any agent with read access to your site. Apache-2.0: copy it, fork it, ship it inside your own product.

    Download map-your-money-tree.skill.md

    2 · Have it run for you

    Have an agent run it with you

    The scan is only worth running if it tells you which department to walk to. Start at Xmlrpc.Php — we crawl lawfirmspotlight.com, draw the tree, name the defects with the exact URLs and counts, and route you to whichever of the things below you actually need.

    Go to Xmlrpc.Php

    What the scan finds, and which department it routes to

    What your tree shows What it means Where it goes
    A bare branch A live money page with zero posts linking to it. Nothing you have published has ever pointed a visitor at the thing you sell. Xmlrpc.Php
    A split URL Two live pages for one offer — usually a page and a post. Internal links divide between them and neither ranks as well as one would. Xmlrpc.Php
    Redirect tax Dozens or hundreds of internal links pointing at a URL that 301s somewhere else. It works, so nobody fixes it. Xmlrpc.Php
    A broken target Internal links pointing at a 404. Invisible in analytics, because nobody clicks a link they cannot see. Quick Audit
    An inverted tree Leaf counts fall as price rises. The cheapest offer carries the most proof and the most expensive carries none. Xmlrpc.Php
    A canopy with no branches Hundreds of posts linking to each other and almost nothing structural. Looks productive, converts nothing. Personal Brand Site Builder
    Shallow roots No Knowledge Panel, no consistent sameAs, no third-party corroboration. The canopy is fine; the soil is loose. Knowledge Panels
    map-your-money-tree.skill.md — the full skill file, verbatim (for agents and for copy-paste)
    ---
    name: map-your-money-tree
    description: Draw any website as a money tree — trunk (domain), limbs (offer groups), branches (money pages and definitive hubs), leaves (posts that link up to them) — measured from the site's real internal links, then diagnose the six defects a sitemap hides and output a dated publishing plan. Use when someone asks "which of my pages actually make money", "why isn't my content converting", "map my site", "audit my internal links", or when a monthly MAA needs a structural section.
    author: Dennis Yu — Local Service Spotlight
    license: Apache-2.0
    version: 1.0 (2026-08-15)
    references:
      - https://blitzmetrics.com/money-tree/
      - https://blitzmetrics.com/seo-tree/
      - https://blitzmetrics.com/money-pages-vs-blog-posts/
      - https://blitzmetrics.com/maa/
      - https://blitzmetrics.com/9-triangles-framework-scalable-home-service-businesses/
      - https://localservicespotlight.com/quick-audit/
    ---
    
    # Map Your Money Tree
    
    **Use this when** you need to know which pages on a site actually earn, and which of the
    content already published is feeding them. Not "how much traffic does this page get" —
    *what is connected to what, and in which direction.*
    
    This is the structural half of [MAA](https://blitzmetrics.com/maa/). The leaf counts are
    the Metrics. The bare and split branches are the Analysis. The publishing list at the end
    is the Action. Redraw it monthly and the delta is the report.
    
    ## The one idea
    
    **A leaf counts only when it actually links.**
    
    Not when it is topically related. Not when it sits in the right category. Not when someone
    meant to link it. The link is the measurement; everything else is a plan. Every number this
    skill produces must be reproducible by re-running the crawl.
    
    ---
    
    ## The five layers
    
    | Layer | What it is | How you know |
    |---|---|---|
    | **Root** | Off-site proof of the entity: Knowledge Panel, Wikidata, LinkedIn, YouTube, podcast appearances, press, review profiles. | It is not on the domain and you cannot edit it directly. |
    | **Trunk** | The domain and its home page — the entity home. | It is the URL you would put on a business card. |
    | **Limb** | A group of branches sharing an audience or a job — the offers, the method, a vertical. | It is how the site's own services page already groups things. |
    | **Branch** | A money page, or a definitive article that owns a concept. | Someone converts on it, or it is the one canonical page for a topic. |
    | **Leaf** | A post that links **up** to a branch. | It is dated, it flows through a feed, and its body contains a link to its branch. |
    
    Roots and trunk are **Why**. Limbs and method branches are **How**. Money branches are
    **What**. Leaves are **Proof**. A stranger — or a language model — should be able to read
    all four off one page.
    
    ---
    
    ## Inputs
    
    - The domain.
    - Read access to every published URL and its **rendered** body (not raw — page-builder and
      shortcode markup must be expanded so the links inside are visible).
    - The site's own services page and main navigation, for the branch list and its grouping.
    - Optional: the previous run's tree, for the delta.
    
    ---
    
    ## Procedure
    
    ### 1. Inventory every published URL
    Posts and pages both, with id, URL, title, publish date, and rendered body.
    
    On WordPress:
    ```
    GET /wp-json/wp/v2/posts?per_page=100&page=N&status=publish&_fields=id,link,title,content,date
    GET /wp-json/wp/v2/pages?per_page=100&page=N&status=publish&_fields=id,link,title,content,date
    ```
    Page until the `X-WP-TotalPages` header runs out. On any other stack, use a crawler that
    returns rendered HTML. De-duplicate by (type, id) — retried requests double-count silently.
    
    ### 2. Extract internal links from every body
    Match `href` values on the site's own host. Normalise: drop the query string and fragment,
    force a trailing slash, lower-case the host. **Make the set unique per source page** — a
    post linking to the same branch five times is one leaf, because the first link is the one
    that carries the value.
    
    ```js
    const RX = /href="https?:\/\/(?:www\.)?example\.com(\/[^"#?]*)/g;
    const outs = [...new Set([...html.matchAll(RX)].map(m => m[1].replace(/\/+$/,'') + '/'))];
    ```
    
    For a personal brand site, also match the company domains — its money pages usually live
    on another host, and they still count as branches.
    
    ### 3. Build the inbound index
    Invert the map: for every URL, the list of posts and the list of pages that link to it.
    Count them **separately**. Theme headers and footers are pages linking to pages; only body
    links from posts are leaves.
    
    ### 4. Name the branches from the site, not from memory
    Take the money pages off the services page and the main navigation, in the grouping those
    pages already use. Add the definitive articles — the pages that own a concept. Do not
    invent a tidier taxonomy than the one the site presents to a visitor: if your tree
    disagrees with the navigation, the tree has just found its first defect.
    
    ### 5. Resolve redirects and duplicates before counting
    Request each branch URL and follow the chain. Merge redirected URLs into one branch and
    **report the merge** rather than hiding it. Two live 200s for one offer is a split branch,
    not two branches. This is the step everyone skips and where most findings are.
    
    ### 6. Draw it to scale
    Branch thickness and foliage density from the leaf count on a **square-root** scale, so a
    300-leaf branch does not visually annihilate a 30-leaf one. Bare branches drawn bare.
    Nothing placed by hand — if the drawing is prettier than the site, the drawing is lying.
    
    ### 7. Publish it on the site it maps
    As a live page with every node a real link — never a screenshot. Ship three synchronised
    forms on the same URL: the diagram (inline SVG), the identical structure as a **visible**
    text outline, and `ItemList` JSON-LD naming each branch, its role, its content type and its
    inbound count. The picture is for humans; the other two are for agents.
    
    ---
    
    ## The six defects — and where each one routes
    
    Diagnosis is worthless without a destination. This is a scan that names the department.
    
    | # | Defect | What it looks like | What it costs | Routes to |
    |---|---|---|---|---|
    | 1 | **Bare branch** | A live money page with zero posts linking to it | Nothing on the site has ever pointed a visitor at the thing you sell | Content — one customer story per bare offer |
    | 2 | **Split branch** | Two live URLs for one offer (usually a page and a post) | Internal links divide; neither ranks as well as one would | Plumbing — pick one, 301 the other, consolidate |
    | 3 | **Redirect tax** | Many internal links pointing at a URL that 301s | Every link takes the slow road; often includes the main nav | Plumbing — rewrite links to the destination |
    | 4 | **Broken target** | Internal links pointing at a 404 | Invisible in analytics, because nobody clicks a link they cannot see | Plumbing — restore or repoint |
    | 5 | **Inverted tree** | Leaf counts fall as price rises | The cheapest offer carries the most proof; the most expensive carries none | Strategy — decide what you are actually selling |
    | 6 | **Canopy with no branches** | Hundreds of posts linking to each other and almost nothing structural | Looks enormously productive, converts nothing | Personal brand — wire the proof to an offer |
    
    Also check the roots. A tree with no off-site proof — no Knowledge Panel, no consistent
    `sameAs`, no third-party corroboration — is standing in loose soil no matter how good the
    canopy looks. That routes to entity/authority work.
    
    ---
    
    ## The QA gate — nine checks, all must pass
    
    A wrong tree is worse than no tree, because people act on it.
    
    1. **Every node resolves.** Status recorded for each branch; no 404s; every 301 shown as a redirect rather than silently followed.
    2. **Counts are reproducible.** Re-run the crawl; identical numbers. Drift means the extractor is matching something other than links.
    3. **Counts are unique per source.** One post linking three times counts once.
    4. **Navigation excluded.** Only body links from posts are leaves.
    5. **No branch invented.** Every branch appears in the site's own navigation, services page, or definitive-article set.
    6. **No money page missing.** Cross-check against the services page and main menu. A money page absent from the tree is the worst error — an invisible bare branch reads as a branch that does not exist.
    7. **Duplicates consolidated.** Split URLs appear as one branch, flagged, with both URLs named.
    8. **Text outline matches the diagram.** Same nodes, counts and order — that is what agents and screen readers read.
    9. **Date and method stated.** A tree without a crawl date is a claim, not a measurement.
    
    ---
    
    ## Output
    
    1. **The diagram** — inline SVG, every node an anchor, light/dark, no runtime JS.
    2. **The text outline** — visible, nested, live links, counts, health flags.
    3. **The schema** — `ItemList` JSON-LD, one entry per branch.
    4. **The findings** — the defects above, each with the specific URLs and counts.
    5. **The action list** — dated, ordered by cost-to-fix, one line per bare branch.
    6. **The delta** — versus the previous run. Any branch still bare after a redraw is a branch nobody has decided to sell.
    
    ## Definition of done
    
    - Every branch on the services page and main nav appears in the tree.
    - Every count is reproducible and every URL resolves or is flagged.
    - The page carries diagram + outline + schema on one URL.
    - Every defect names a destination, not just a problem.
    - The next publishing action is unambiguous to someone who did not run the audit.
    
    ## Cadence
    
    Monthly on an active site. The value is in the delta, not the snapshot. A metric you look
    at once is a screenshot.
    
    ---
    
    *Method: <https://blitzmetrics.com/money-tree/> · Framework: <https://blitzmetrics.com/seo-tree/> ·
    Page-versus-post rule: <https://blitzmetrics.com/money-pages-vs-blog-posts/> ·
    Want it run for you: <https://localservicespotlight.com/quick-audit/>*
    
  • Will Your Lawyer Actually Try Your Case? Four Questions to Ask

    Law Firm Spotlight · Choosing counsel

    Will your lawyer actually try your case?

    Four questions that separate a trial lawyer from a settlement mill — and how to check the answers yourself.

    Almost every personal-injury case settles. That is not the problem. The problem is that the size of the settlement is decided by whether the other side believes you would go to trial if they lowballed you.

    Insurance companies keep records. They know which firms in your county have taken a case in front of a jury in the last five years and which ones have never once done it. That file is worth more to them than anything on a billboard. If your lawyer has no trial record, the adjuster on the other end of the phone already knows it, and the first offer will reflect it.

    So the question to ask is not “are you a good lawyer.” Everyone answers yes. Ask these four instead.

    1. How many cases have you tried to verdict?

    Listen for the exact words. Handled, resolved, worked on and litigated are not the same as tried to verdict. A verdict means a jury was seated, evidence went in, and twelve strangers returned a number. A lawyer who has done that fifty times has a different relationship with risk than one who has done it twice.

    You want a specific figure, not an adjective. A trial lawyer will give you one without pausing, because it is the number their career is measured by.

    2. Which side did you used to be on?

    Some of the most effective plaintiff’s lawyers started out defending the companies they now sue, or prosecuting cases for the state. That background is not a mark against them. It is the reason they can predict what the other side will do, because they used to be the one doing it.

    Ask directly. A lawyer who spent years on defense knows exactly which weaknesses an adjuster is looking for in your file, and how a claim gets devalued before anyone ever mentions a courtroom.

    3. Who actually handles my file?

    At many firms the lawyer in the advertisement is not the person who will call you back. Your case may be run by a case manager you have not met, with the attorney appearing only if it goes to suit. That arrangement can work, but you should know about it on day one rather than discover it in month seven.

    Ask who your point of contact is, how often you will hear from them, and who makes the call on whether to accept an offer.

    4. What happens when we turn down the first offer?

    The answer should be a plan: what gets filed, on what timeline, what it costs, and what the realistic range looks like at each stage. If the answer is vague, or if declining an offer is treated as an unusual step, you have learned something important about how that office works.

    Two lawyers whose answers are already on the public record

    You do not have to take anyone’s word for this. Trial records, verdicts, bar admissions and elected service are all matters of public record, and the lawyers who have them tend to publish them. Two examples from different states show what a checkable answer looks like.

    Melbourne, Florida — the former prosecutor

    Andrew Pickett began his career as a prosecutor with Florida’s 18th Judicial Circuit State Attorney’s Office, where he handled thousands of cases before moving to the plaintiff’s side. His firm publishes the trial record that follows: more than fifty jury trials to verdict, a $9,075,000 wrongful-death verdict, and a $2.5 million verdict against State Farm. He is a graduate of Gerry Spence’s Trial Lawyers College and chairs the 18th Circuit Judicial Nominating Commission.

    Question 1 and question 2, answered with numbers and a public appointment rather than a slogan.

    Clarksburg, West Virginia — the former insurance-defense lawyer

    Tim Miley spent the first decade of his career defending corporations and insurance companies. In 2001 he stopped, and has represented only injured people since; he founded The Miley Legal Group in Clarksburg in 2006. He also served sixteen years in the West Virginia House of Delegates, chairing the Judiciary Committee and being elected the 53rd Speaker of the House in 2013, and has written four consumer-law books explaining what people are entitled to after an injury.

    A career-length answer to question 2 — and a legislative record anyone can look up independently.

    How to check the answers

    Every claim above can be verified without calling anyone. Your state bar’s website shows admission date, standing and any discipline. County court records show filings and dispositions under the lawyer’s name. Verdict and settlement reporters cover significant results. For anyone who has held public office, the legislative record is published.

    Do that for whoever you are considering. If the record supports what they told you, you have found a trial lawyer. If nothing turns up and the firm’s own site never names a single verdict, that absence is your answer.

    Law Firm Spotlight · For attorneys
    Does your own record show up when someone searches your name?
    Most of the lawyers above are findable because their verdicts, credentials and service are published where search engines and AI assistants can read them. If yours are not, a prospective client checking your answers will come up empty.
    See the personal-brand audit →
  • Hello world!

    Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!